{"id":1497349,"date":"2024-10-20T02:10:00","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T06:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/?p=1497349"},"modified":"2024-10-20T02:10:00","modified_gmt":"2024-10-20T06:10:00","slug":"the-omniwar-is-everywhere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/the-omniwar-is-everywhere\/1497349\/","title":{"rendered":"The Omniwar Is Everywhere"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Omniwar Is Everywhere<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Authored by Joe Allen via BombThrower.com,<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The Omniwar Symposium was\u00a0well worth watching<\/a>\u00a0in full. It hits many points I\u2019ve been covering for years now, from transhuman ambition to religious inversion. Even so, there was plenty of new material for me to sink my teeth into. All the presenters are admirably learned and articulate, so the info went down easy.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Their overarching thesis posits an all-encompassing assault by elite powers on mass populations – the fat cats against \u201cthe people.\u201d This is a global war, waged alongside various inter-elite geopolitical conflicts. In the long view, the omniwar is a struggle to establish a technocratic hegemony. It is a fight to crush our freedoms. It is a war against humanity.<\/strong><\/p>\n

By and large, this accusation is a response to the traumatic Covid measures brought down on the citizens of nearly every nation on earth. I may disagree with the symposium\u2019s ultimate conclusions\u2014especially those\u00a0godforsaken nanobots<\/a>\u2014but they\u2019ll get no argument from me about the 2020 terror campaign. In America, people in most states saw their rights trampled upon. Corporations and the federal government forced vaccination under penalty of unemployment. Lives were upended. Family ties were broken. It was a crime against human dignity.<\/p>\n

Those were treacherous times. Without future safeguards, they\u2019re likely to be repeated ad nauseam. One key component of resistance, though, will be to attack the system with precision, and not allow ourselves to get lost in puerile fantasies.<\/p>\n

The symposium included my friend Patrick Wood, who has\u00a0taught me a great deal<\/a>\u00a0about technocracy and transhumanism. His presentation was characteristically lucid, from the early history of the technocracy movement at Columbia University to its continued relevance in our present era. \u201cTechnocracy is the science of social engineering,\u201d <\/strong><\/em>Patrick quoted from a 1937 issue of\u00a0The Technocrat<\/em>, \u201cthe scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

The Covid crackdown was nothing if not technocratic in essence. Governments used \u201cthe numbers\u201d to lock down their citizens and neutralize their justified protests. Drug corporations hid the real numbers to deny their customers\u2019 vaccine injuries. Both colluded to form impromptu biosecurity states. These people should all burn in hell\u2014at least for a little while.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Despite the normie-con temptation to attribute everything to \u201cMarxism\u201d (which is sort of like Jew obsession, minus the nepotism and alleged moneylust), Patrick drew a clear distinction between technocracy and communism. \u201cMarxists hated technocracy with a passion,\u201d he explained, \u201cand for good reason: technocrats would push man out of the picture altogether, resulting in a hierarchy of scientific dictatorship run by scientists and engineers.\u201d<\/p>\n

That insight doesn\u2019t play well with TV-brained Fox News fans, but I appreciate the nuance. \u201cTechnocracy wanted to do away with all political systems,\u201d Patrick went on, \u201cincluding communism and socialism.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Similarly, while acknowledging that most technocrats and transhumanists begin from atheistic premises\u2014viewing the organic world as a system of interlocking mechanisms\u2014Patrick emphasized that not all atheists are technocrats or transhumanists. Such distinctions will be critical going forward, lest we come off like torch-bearing witch-hunters.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

As it happens, a recent paper by one Omniwar participant, Daniel Broudy, inspired me to resume my research into nano-scale technology. The idea is that the Covid jabs\u2014and perhaps chemtrails streaking overhead\u2014contain sophisticated nanobots which can be activated by 5G routers to monitor or manipulate a subject\u2019s body and brain. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Some say these self-assembling vaxxbots can kill a man like tiny ball-busting pagers floating through his bloodstream. Click\u2026 BOOM!<\/p>\n

I remain unconvinced.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In fact, an expert commentary hastily published by the same outlet as Broudy\u2019s paper\u2014the\u00a0International Journal of Vaccine Practice, Theory, and Research<\/em>\u2014flatly states there are \u201cNo Nanobots in Vaccines \u2014 Just Lipids on the Loose.<\/a>\u201d But in sensationalist vaxxbot circles, the psychological damage has already been done and the clickbait money already extracted.<\/p>\n

Broudy avoided all mention of the nanos during his Omniwar presentation, leaving that to his co-authors Lissa Johnson and David Hughes. Instead, he focused on the broader sociological implications of technocracy. The presentation was well-written, and he read it from his screen with eloquence. His main point was that our leaders treat us like cattle, using surveillance and mind control to herd the masses at will.<\/p>\n

My regular readers will know I agree with that up to a point. But a one-dimensional characterization misses two vital elements. First off, anyone who\u2019s carefully studied the transhumanist literature knows that \u201cliberty<\/a>\u201d and \u201cmorphological freedom<\/a>\u201d are key principles that complicate any top-down oppression narrative.<\/p>\n

Second, and just as important, is the dark reality that\u2014much like large-scale technocratic institutions treat mass populations like cattle\u2014many business savvy \u201cfreedom fighters\u201d have captured the imaginations of smaller sub-populations, filled their heads with sci-fi delusions, and made off with their minds (and money) like web-crawling cattle-rustlers.<\/p>\n

Speaking about large-scale control systems, though, Broudy did include one quote from Bertrand Russell\u2019s essay \u201cScientific Technique in an Oligarchy<\/a>\u201d that really captures the menace of our age. In his original passage, Russell highlights the \u201cevils\u201d of Soviet Russia and the \u201catrocities\u201d of the Nazis, looking ahead to the more insidious possibilities of scientific totalitarianism. For whatever reason, Broudy omits Russell\u2019s obvious disdain for communism, fascism, and dictatorship, but his excerpt is relevant nonetheless.<\/p>\n

\u201cDiet, injections, and injunctions will combine,\u201d<\/strong><\/em> Russell wrote in 1951, \u201cto produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Broudy pairs this quote with the 2016 slogan \u201cYou\u2019ll own nothing and be happy,\u201d which, to Broudy\u2019s credit, he traces not to Klaus Schwab\u2014as is fashionable\u2014but rather to its original source. Even so, Broudy\u2019s presentation had the effect of flattening the problems of our era to some World Economic Forum-centered conspiracy. If only life were so simple.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Lissa Johnson gave the most compelling talk, describing \u201ctranshumanism as a military-intelligence operation with Covid-19 as a supporting psychological operation.\u201d Her literature review of military, government, and corporate documents was superb. She cited a number of white papers I\u2019d never seen before, so I\u2019ve been following her trail for several days now. This new information has been illuminating, and for that I\u2019m grateful.<\/p>\n

In fact, I highly recommend you listen to her talk in full. If that piques your interest, do read the four-part series that Johnson co-authored with Daniel Broudy and David Hughes. The information they marshal is of great interest, although I suspect their literalist, overly imaginative conclusions will do more harm than good. That\u2019s for you to decide. (Well, you and objective reality, if anyone can grasp such a thing.)<\/p>\n

Two themes from Johnson\u2019s presentation really hit me: the \u201cmanipulation of reality perception\u201d and the recurring dreams (and nightmares) of advanced nanotechnology.<\/strong> It\u2019s true that, by their very nature, psychological operations are methods of perceptual manipulation. It\u2019s also true that advanced nanotech transmitters\u2014whether administered via injection or aerosol\u2014are a long-standing goal of both military and medical authorities. Yet there\u2019s an ironic connection between these two notions that Johnson seems to miss.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

If, as Johnson, Broudy, and Hughes suggest, the human race is presently being seeded with self-assembling nano-scale circuitry or full-blown nanobots\u2014whether injected into arms or dropped from fake clouds\u2014then we live in a nightmare world of invisible\u00a0creepy crawlies<\/a>. These are basically UFOs in your bloodstream: unidentified floating objects. They can\u2019t stop Covid, apparently, but they can monitor your vital signs and control your mind.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, if such nanotech still remains in a fantasy realm alongside quantum computers and artificial superintelligence\u2014both of which attract billions in funding, with little more than neat parlor tricks to show for it\u2014then Johnson et al. are leading people to chase invisible Easter Bunnies down a rabbit hole to nowhere.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Whether they mean to or not, they also discredit any real resistance to governmental technocracy and corporate transhumanism by activating delusional loud-mouths.<\/p>\n

\u201cDon\u2019t ya\u2019ll worry about no mRNAs in them shots. It\u2019s the nanner bots that\u2019ll get\u2019che!!\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Indeed, if viable, mass-deployed nanobots do not yet exist, then vaxxbot alarmism is itself a psy op. It\u2019s a \u201cmanipulation of reality perception\u201d that convinces dupes to believe their vaxxed friends and family are 5G-controlled zombies, or that airborne nanos are falling from the sky like demonic snowflakes. In that case, the evil vaxxbot is part of a \u201csimulated reality\u201d that rips people\u2019s minds apart.<\/p>\n

Johnson et al. do a great job of showing intent, though. No one can deny that well-heeled scientists and government agents want to use nanotech to cure illness\u2014and to deploy nanos as weaponry. This is hardly a secret. You can find bold statements of intent everywhere, from\u00a0best-selling books<\/a>\u00a0to\u00a0YouTube videos<\/a>\u00a0posted by the would-be perpetrators themselves.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s far more difficult to prove that secret agents are deploying invisible nanotech right now. Johnson primes the pump with her more articulate version the oft-repeated mantra: \u201cTop secret tech is\u00a0decades<\/em>\u00a0ahead of anything we see today!!\u201d To support this notion, she cites the former head of NASA\u2019s Langley Research Center, Dennis Bushnell, whose infamous 2001 slideshow \u201cFuture Strategic Issues\/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]<\/a>\u201d has been making the rounds for many years.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Johnson goes through a list of exotic technologies\u2014genetic engineering of human beings, implantable electronics, nanobots, smart dust, biocomputing, artificial life, etc. She then interprets a vague bullet point on Bushnell\u2019s slide as meaning \u201csuch technologies remain in inventory for over forty years\u201d so they were \u201cno pixie dust\u201d back in 2001. If I understand Johnson correctly, she\u2019s saying classified technology is already\u00a0forty years<\/em>\u00a0into the Future\u2122!<\/p>\n

To support this mythos, Johnson cites the Harvard science historian Peter Galison, who\u00a0once argued<\/a>\u00a0that \u201cclassified scientific research is five to ten times larger than what we see in the open literature.\u201d That wildly imprecise estimate seems overblown to me, but for the sake of argument, let\u2019s assume this is true.<\/p>\n

Why should we assume this galaxy of classified R&D has produced a slew of viable technologies? Think of it this way:<\/p>\n

Two primary objectives of nanotech are to cure disease and reverse aging. If our clandestine agencies have nanos that are decades ahead of what we see today, why are Ray Kurzweil and Klaus Schwab\u00a0deteriorating<\/a>\u00a0before\u00a0our eyes<\/a>? Wouldn\u2019t they be among the first to get a neurological nano-boost, or at least a cellular face-lift?<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Have their minds been uploaded to a secret metaverse for the elite, leaving their senile husks to babble onstage?<\/p>\n

As a thought experiment, let\u2019s imagine Bushnell\u2019s speculative NASA slideshow contains literal descriptions of existent tech in 2001\u2014actual \u201c\u2018Bots and \u2018Borgs\u201d and \u201cwonderous\/ubiquitous land\/sea\/air\/space multiphysics\/hyperspectral sensor swarms.\u201d<\/p>\n

Okay then, why are two astronauts\u00a0still stranded<\/a>\u00a0on the International Space Station? And why are windows\u00a0blowing out<\/a>\u00a0of Boeing aircraft? Are NASA and Boeing pretending to be incompetent so no one looks for their secret moon base?<\/p>\n

I\u2019m serious.<\/p>\n

To be fair, Johnson does confront the question: \u201cWhere is the tangible R&D?\u201d <\/strong><\/em>However, her evidence is just another series of quotes from think tank employees and military propagandists who talk about all the great stuff they\u2019re doing\u2014i.e., justifying their paychecks. Johnson then cites a handful of well-funded nanotech projects. Allow me to put forward a counterpoint: so far, these people have wasted a lot of money for next to nothing in return.<\/p>\n

Johnson presents exactly zero evidence that labs have produced self-assembling nano-scale circuitry or nanobots that are ready to be deployed on a dozen people in the wild\u2014let alone half the world\u2019s population. Even worse, she goes on to show us crudely rendered cartoons of proposed biodigital networks as evidence of mature technologies. She concludes by defending certain \u201cscientists\u201d who claim to find vaxxbots under their microscope lenses (which, again, was sternly rebutted here).<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s not pixie dust,\u201d <\/strong>Johnson insists. Indeed, I\u2019m more inclined to believe pixie dust actually exists.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Johnson and Broudy\u2019s co-author, David Hughes, won me over at first during his Omniwar presentation. He and I share an appreciation of the satanist-hunting schizoid,\u00a0Vigilant Citizen<\/a>, whose dot-connecting analysis of mass entertainment amused me for many years\u2014at least until VC went behind an esoteric paywall. Even if our metaphysics differ, I thought to myself, Hughes and I would probably have much to discuss over a couple of pints.<\/p>\n

Then, as if to taunt me, Hughes went on to proudly endorse the harebrained theory that the World Trade Center towers were brought down by \u201cdirected free-energy technology<\/a>\u201d\u2014a.k.a. space lasers. With a calm and confident British accent, Hughes suggested our \u201celite rulers\u201d are lying about \u201cfinite resources\u201d on earth so they can exert \u201cglobal centralized control.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat happens, then, if all of that is a founding myth? What happens if there is such a thing as free-energy technology?\u201d <\/strong><\/em>Hughes asks skeptically. \u201cWhat happens if there actually is the possibility of limitless abundance in the world? These are the things that people need to know about, because it really exposes the foundation of the control system.\u201d<\/p>\n

Good questions. Allow me to pose another. What happens when the Skeptoid Ouroboros leads an otherwise sharp individual to abandon centuries of scientific research in favor of unlimited oil and magic \u201cpixie dust\u201d technology?<\/p>\n

Is the ultimate objective for \u201cthe people\u201d to get their hands on this \u201cfree-energy technology\u201d so we can, I dunno, inject ourselves with life-extension serum or build space communes on Mars?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Look, I\u2019m gonna let you in on a dark secret of the cosmos: most people will believe anything. That includes a belief in absurd technologies, whether benevolent or malevolent. A person\u2019s high IQ is no protection from that tendency. In fact, due to the ample mental space a big brain provides, it\u2019s oftentimes a handicap.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

To paraphrase Mork: \u201cNano, nano.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

I humbly suggest that Johnson, Broudy, and Hughes look up from their stacks of white papers for a moment and think about what they\u2019re saying. If top secret projects really are \u201ctwenty years ahead of anything we see today,\u201d there would be an unknown continent where flying cars buzz around AI-controlled cities running on cold fusion generators. Maybe scientists there are using time machines to bring back dinosaurs for the local zoo.<\/p>\n

No one can prove a negative. So I cannot prove that ubiquitously deployed nanobots don\u2019t exist. Nor can I prove that viable flying cars (not those wobbly mini-copters) and sustainable cold fusion are only pipedreams clogging up the patent office. It\u2019s a big world out there. What do I know?<\/p>\n

But after five hours of listening to the Omniwar Symposium, I\u2019m less convinced of vaccine- or chemtrail-borne nanos than when I began. Instead, I\u2019m even more convinced that internet-borne memes can attach themselves to a person\u2019s brain and detach his or her consciousness from objective reality.<\/strong><\/p>\n

I am not arguing that the vaxxbot theories floated by Johnson, Broudy, and Hughes are untrue. I am saying I don\u2019t believe them. Their source material is of great value and I commend their research efforts. But their aggressive conclusions are unconvincing.<\/p>\n

As for my readers, I encourage you to listen to this trio, to read their papers carefully, and draw your own conclusions. By now you know I have no intention of telling you what to believe. Not that it would matter if I did. If there\u2019s one thing I\u2019ve learned over the past few years, it\u2019s that people will believe whatever they like.<\/p>\n

*\u00a0 *\u00a0 *<\/p>\n

Subscribe\u00a0the Bombthrower mailing list<\/a>\u00a0to get these pieces as they drop, you\u2019ll also receive a free copy of\u00a0The Crypto Capitalist Manifesto<\/strong>. <\/em>Sign up for Joe Allen\u2019s\u00a0Singularity Weekly here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nSat, 10\/19\/2024 – 22:10<\/span><\/p>\n

\u200bhttps:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/geopolitical\/omniwar-everywhere<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Omniwar Is Everywhere Authored by Joe Allen via BombThrower.com, The Omniwar Symposium was\u00a0well worth watching\u00a0in full. It hits many points I\u2019ve been covering for…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1497350,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1497349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1497349","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1497349"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1497349\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1497350"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1497349"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1497349"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1497349"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}