{"id":1507548,"date":"2024-12-12T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-12T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/?p=1507548"},"modified":"2024-12-12T14:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-12-12T19:00:00","slug":"supreme-court-rules-9-0-federal-judges-cannot-second-guess-visa-revocations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/supreme-court-rules-9-0-federal-judges-cannot-second-guess-visa-revocations\/1507548\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Rules 9\u20130 Federal Judges Cannot Second-Guess Visa Revocations"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden\">Supreme Court Rules 9\u20130 Federal Judges Cannot Second-Guess Visa Revocations<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item\">\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/us\/supreme-court-rules-us-government-may-revoke-visas-for-sham-marriages-5773947?utm_source=partner&amp;utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&amp;src_src=partner&amp;src_cmp=ZeroHedge\">Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times<\/a> (emphasis ours),<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Dec. 10 that federal courts may not review the federal government\u2019s decision to revoke an immigration visa.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The court\u2019s 9\u20130 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/24pdf\/23-583_onjq.pdf\">opinion<\/a> in Bouarfa v. Mayorkas was written by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The respondent is U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image%28774%29_0.jpg?itok=F4TF4OlH\"><em>The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Dec. 2, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu\/The Epoch Times<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the case, the DHS revoked a Palestinian man\u2019s visa after it found he previously attempted to pass off another one of his marriages as legitimate to obtain permanent resident status. Because the government determined he engaged in fraud before, the current marriage was deemed fraudulent, and his visa, which had been approved, was canceled.<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner, Amina Bouarfa, a U.S. citizen, married noncitizen Ala\u2019a Hamayel. They produced three children, all of whom are U.S. citizens, according to Bouarfa\u2019s petition to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>Around three years after they married, Bouarfa filed an immigration petition to classify her husband as an immediate relative, which would make him eligible for adjustment to permanent resident status.<\/p>\n<p>In 2015, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), an agency of the DHS, approved the wife\u2019s petition, but in 2017 it moved to revoke its approval, citing evidence Hamayel\u2019s first marriage was fraudulent. The agency said if it had known of the sham marriage, it would not have granted the petition.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bouarfa disputed the decision the same year and the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled against her in 2021, finding federal law barred approval of the petition.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In January 2022, Bouarfa sued in a federal district court in Florida, requesting a review of the board\u2019s decision under the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs how government agencies create and enforce rules. The court dismissed the case, finding it lacked authority to hear it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed, holding that federal law precludes judicial review of the revocation of a visa and that revocations are \u201cdiscretionary\u2014no matter the basis for revocation.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling, <strong>Jackson wrote that the decision to revoke involved \u201ca quintessential grant of discretion\u201d to DHS that judges are unable to review.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Jackson wrote that the law provides that the DHS secretary \u201cmay, at any time, for what he deems to be good and sufficient cause, revoke the approval of any [visa] petition.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Despite this, Bouarfa still has options, as the government acknowledges. \u201cNothing prohibits a citizen from filing another petition on behalf of the same relative,\u201d the justice wrote, adding that nothing in the law requires the secretary to uphold the sham marriage determination.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, Bouarfa has already re-filed and if her petition is turned down again because of the sham marriage finding, she may seek judicial review, Jackson added.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the 11th Circuit.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Epoch Times reached out for comment to the U.S. Department of Justice, which represents the DHS, and Bouarfa\u2019s attorney, Samir Ibrahim Deger-Sen of Latham and Watkins in New York City. No replies were received by publication time.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>      <span class=\"field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden\"><a title=\"View user profile.\" href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/users\/tyler-durden\" class=\"username\">Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden\">Thu, 12\/12\/2024 &#8211; 09:00<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u200b<a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/political\/supreme-court-rules-9-0-federal-judges-cannot-second-guess-visa-revocations\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/political\/supreme-court-rules-9-0-federal-judges-cannot-second-guess-visa-revocations<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court Rules 9\u20130 Federal Judges Cannot Second-Guess Visa Revocations Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours), The U.S. Supreme Court ruled&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1507549,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1507548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbimBl-6kbi","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2024\/12\/image2877429_0-TVtx86.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1507548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1507548"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1507548\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1507549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1507548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1507548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1507548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}