{"id":1531375,"date":"2025-04-20T15:05:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-20T19:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/?p=1531375"},"modified":"2025-04-20T15:05:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-20T19:05:00","slug":"la-county-quality-of-life-index-stuck-at-a-10-year-low-new-survey-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/la-county-quality-of-life-index-stuck-at-a-10-year-low-new-survey-finds\/1531375\/","title":{"rendered":"LA County Quality Of Life Index Stuck At A 10-Year Low; New Survey Finds"},"content":{"rendered":"

LA County Quality Of Life Index Stuck At A 10-Year Low; New Survey Finds<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Los Angeles County residents have plenty to worry about amid a wildfire recovery effort, federal immigration crackdowns, and persistent homelessness,<\/strong> but what most concerns them is the cost of living<\/strong>, according to an annual UCLA survey<\/a> released on April 16.<\/p>\n

The 10th Annual Quality of Life Index (QLI) survey<\/a> polled 1,400 county residents between Feb. 23 and March 9, and found widespread frustration with the high cost of living, including increasing prices of groceries and household items.<\/p>\n

The survey, conducted by UCLA\u2019s Luskin School of Public Affairs, found that concern over the high cost of living has kept the QLI at a lowly 53, the same as last year.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

That number represents the lowest level in the survey\u2019s history. In 2016, the QLI came in at 59.<\/p>\n

\u201cMeanwhile, the salience of [the cost of living category] has risen to its highest-ever point in this index, and is joined by a growing concern about jobs and the economy,\u201d said the survey, which was prepared by Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates (FM3 Research).\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThe combination represents fundamental bread-and-butter issues that are the biggest explainers of the longer-term lukewarm attitudes toward life in Los Angeles County.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

As Kimberley Hayek reports for The Epoch Times,<\/em><\/a> more than two-fifths of respondents claimed to know someone who lost a home or business in the January wildfires.<\/strong>\u00a0<\/p>\n

An additional 23 percent, including those who live relatively far from the burn areas, such as the northern part of the county and the South Bay, claimed to know someone affected. Meanwhile, 14 percent of respondents said they lost significant income due to the fires, while another 13 percent said they incurred a nonsignificant loss.<\/p>\n

More than half of respondents said they wore a mask to avoid smoke, volunteered or donated to help victims, and feared having to evacuate.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile the percentage of residents who lost income is lower than the percentages of those who experienced other impacts, it still represents millions of Angelenos,\u201d <\/strong><\/em>said the survey, which found that Latinos, younger residents, lower income earners, and those working part-time jobs were disproportionately affected.<\/p>\n

Eighty-nine percent of county residents agree that homeowners who lost their property in the fires should be permitted to rebuild at the same locations. In 2019, when residents were asked the same question in the wake of the Woolsey Fire near Simi Valley, 76 percent agreed.<\/p>\n

\u201cBoth numbers are high, but suggest that the geographic breadth of the [January] fires, the extent of the destruction and the collateral impacts they had on a wide swath of the county significantly influenced this year\u2019s results,\u201d<\/strong><\/em> the survey said.<\/p>\n

The Palisades and Eaton fires this year destroyed more than 16,000 structures; the Woolsey fire destroyed 1,600, according<\/a> to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.<\/p>\n

Fifty-two percent of county residents said they would generally be OK with increased taxes for improved wildfire response. Younger residents, Latinos, and Asians were most open to the proposal. Whites and African Americans were evenly split on the idea, which did not include specifics.<\/p>\n

Attitudes toward the Los Angeles mayor were affected by the wildfires, the survey said.<\/p>\n

For example, just 37 percent of respondents view Mayor Karen Bass favorably, with 49 percent viewing her unfavorably. That\u2019s a reversal from 2024, when 42 percent viewed her favorably and 32 percent unfavorably.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe wildfires that raged in Altadena and Pacific Palisades in January are the story of this year\u2019s survey,\u201d <\/strong><\/em>said Zev Yaroslavsky, director of the Luskin School\u2019s Los Angeles Initiative.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese catastrophic events have left devastating physical and psychological impacts in their wake,\u201d said the former county supervisor.<\/p>\n

\u201cAlthough the primary victims are those who lost their lives, homes and possessions, millions of other Angelenos have been touched by these terrifying events in myriad ways. These impacts cross geographic, economic and racial lines that can only be described as a shared trauma across Los Angeles County.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Cost of Living<\/h2>\n

The county\u2019s high cost of living has become a major source of frustration for residents. Three-quarters of respondents chose it as the most important category affecting their quality of life. Among the subcategories, the cost of housing remains the leader, but the costs of groceries and household items rose in importance, as did taxes.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe overall satisfaction score on our QLI index is stuck for one main reason\u2014the impact of the high cost of living,\u201d <\/strong><\/em>said Paul Maslin, a public opinion and polling expert with FM3 Research.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cThose concerns were the highest in terms of importance of any category we\u2019ve measured in the last decade. And cost of living continues to be the lowest rating category in terms of satisfaction.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Immigration and deportation<\/h2>\n

Forty-four percent of county residents fear that a member of their family or a friend could face deportation by federal authorities.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In 2017, 37 percent expressed such a fear at the start of Trump\u2019s first administration.<\/p>\n

Latinos are most likely to feel this way at 54 percent.<\/strong> By age group, residents aged 18-29 and 30-39 are the most likely to fear a member of their family or friend could be deported at 57 percent and 52 percent, respectively. They are also most likely to believe that the city and county governments should not cooperate with the federal government\u2019s current deportation policies.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe new administration in Washington has once again brought the question of immigration and deportation to the fore,\u201d Yaroslavsky said.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cThis is very much an issue that is front and center on the minds of a large part of our county\u2019s population.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Homelessness<\/h2>\n

Homelessness remains at or near the top of concerns for residents,<\/strong> though for the first time in a while, the portion who believe the homelessness problems are worsening has declined by 8 percentage points.\u00a0In 2024, 60 percent thought the problem was growing worse. In the 2025 survey, 52 percent thought so. Yet only 10 percent believe the situation is getting better.<\/strong> That number was the same in 2024.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nSun, 04\/20\/2025 – 11:05<\/span><\/p>\n

\u200bhttps:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/personal-finance\/la-county-quality-life-index-stuck-10-year-low-new-survey-finds<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

LA County Quality Of Life Index Stuck At A 10-Year Low; New Survey Finds Los Angeles County residents have plenty to worry about amid a…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1531376,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1531375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbimBl-6qnB","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/04\/image20288729_5-D7hj7s.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1531375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1531375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1531375\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1531376"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1531375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1531375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1531375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}