{"id":1533573,"date":"2025-05-01T20:39:03","date_gmt":"2025-05-02T00:39:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/?p=1533573"},"modified":"2025-05-01T20:39:03","modified_gmt":"2025-05-02T00:39:03","slug":"amazon-tumbles-on-soft-aws-revenue-disappointing-profit-forecast","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/amazon-tumbles-on-soft-aws-revenue-disappointing-profit-forecast\/1533573\/","title":{"rendered":"Amazon Tumbles On Soft AWS Revenue, Disappointing Profit Forecast"},"content":{"rendered":"

Amazon Tumbles On Soft AWS Revenue, Disappointing Profit Forecast<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Ahead of Amazon’s earnings, and following two blowout results from the first two giga-cap companies MSFT and META, UBS said that the “fast money seems to be short Amazon into the quarter on AWS and North America sales growth, with no upward revisions on the print.” Meanwhile, the longer duration money “continues to like the story around AWS reacceleration, potential EBIT upside to Street, compelling valuation and potential AI theme around core ecommerce.” In short, there was a tension between the short-term traders and long-term HODLers.<\/p>\n

Judging by the kneejerk reaction to Q1 earnings just released<\/a>, the short-termers were right, with the stock dumping after reporting mixed Q1 earnings but it was the guidance that was really disappointing.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Here are the details:<\/p>\n

EPS $1.59 vs. $1.86 q\/q, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate $1.36<\/p>\n

Net sales $155.67 billion, +8.6% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimates of $155.16 billion<\/p>\n

Online stores net sales $57.41 billion, +5% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimates of $56.85 billion<\/p>\n

Physical Stores net sales $5.53 billion, +6.4% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimates of $5.41 billion<\/p>\n

Third-Party Seller Services net sales $36.51 billion, +5.5% y\/y, missing <\/strong><\/em>estimates of\u00a0 $36.98 billion<\/p>\n

Subscription Services net sales $11.72 billion, +9.3% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimates of $11.65 billion<\/p>\n

North America net sales $92.89 billion, +7.6% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate $92.63 billion<\/p>\n

International net sales $33.51 billion, +4.9% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate $33.07 billion<\/p>\n

Third-party seller services net sales excluding F\/X +7% vs. +16% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate +6.92%<\/p>\n

Subscription services net sales excluding F\/X +11% vs. +11% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate +8.86%<\/p>\n

So far so good (with some exceptions).<\/p>\n

But what first caught the market’s attention first was Amazon’s AWS revenue, which came in just below estimates:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Amazon Web Service net sales $29.27 billion, +17% y\/y, missing <\/strong><\/em>estimates $29.36 billion<\/p>\n

Amazon Web Services net sales excluding F\/X +17% vs. +17% y\/y, also missing <\/strong><\/em>estimates +17.2%<\/p>\n

Turning to operating profits, here the results were uniformly solid:<\/p>\n

AWS operating profit 39.45%, up sequentially from 36.83% and smashing estimates of 35.25%<\/strong><\/p>\n

Operating income $18.41 billion, +20% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate $17.51 billion<\/p>\n

Operating margin 11.8% vs. 10.7% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate 11.2%<\/p>\n

North America operating margin +6.3% vs. +5.8% y\/y, missing <\/strong><\/em>estimate +6.65%<\/p>\n

International operating margin 3% vs. 2.8% y\/y, beating <\/strong><\/em>estimate 2.96%<\/p>\n

As for fulfillment expenses, these came in slightly above estimates, while the seller unit mix was slightly worse than expected. These will likely rise quite a bit in a tariff regime:<\/p>\n

Fulfillment expense $24.59 billion, +10% y\/y, higher <\/strong><\/em>than estimate $23.78 billion<\/p>\n

Seller unit mix 61% vs. 61% y\/y, worse <\/strong>than estimate 61.8%<\/p>\n

Of the above, the most notable highlight – as per our preview – was AWS which grew revenue by 17% to $29.27BN, just below the sellside estimate of $29.36BN, and the first notable slowdown in the topline in two years.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Still, if revenue growth for AWS was a bit light, the record 39.5% margin more than offset it, beating estimates of 35.35%.<\/strong> Elsewhere, North American profit rose to $5.84 billion, resulting in a profit of 6.29%, if below the estimate of 6.65%. Meanwhile, international margins rose to 3.30% from 3.03%.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

As a result of the jump in AWS profits, Amazon’s consolidated operating margin continued to grow impressively and in Q1 grew for a 4th consecutive quarter to a new all time high of 11.8%.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

However, while the above data was mixed if generally solid, it was the company’s guidance that led to an after hours drop in the stock; that’s because the company projected profit and revenue in the current quarter both of which were seen as coming in soft vs Wall Street expectations:<\/p>\n

Sees net sales $159.0 billion to $164.0 billion, in line with the estimate<\/strong><\/em> of $161.4 billion<\/p>\n

Sees operating income $13.0 billion to $17.50 billion, below the estimate <\/strong><\/em>$17.82 billion, vs $14.7 billion in Q2 2024.<\/p>\n

Guidance sees impact of about 10 basis points from FX<\/p>\n

If accurate, that would mean that after revenue grew at the slowest pace since 2022 in Q1, the outlook sees revenue growth post a modest improvement, rising just over 9% in Q2.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

But again, it was the subpar operating income forecast that was the big disappointment. <\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

In response to the soft guidance and the disappointing AWS revenue growth, the stock initially pumped but then dumped…<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nThu, 05\/01\/2025 – 16:39<\/span><\/p>\n

\u200bhttps:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/markets\/amazon-tumbles-soft-aws-revenue-disappointing-profit-forecast<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Amazon Tumbles On Soft AWS Revenue, Disappointing Profit Forecast Ahead of Amazon’s earnings, and following two blowout results from the first two giga-cap companies MSFT…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1533574,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1533573","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbimBl-6qX3","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2025\/05\/aws20growth20sloed-EIlwZN.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1533573","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1533573"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1533573\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1533574"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1533573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1533573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1533573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}