{"id":1534066,"date":"2025-05-05T00:25:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T04:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/?p=1534066"},"modified":"2025-05-05T00:25:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T04:25:00","slug":"supreme-courts-ketanji-jackson-says-criticizing-judges-is-attack-on-democracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/supreme-courts-ketanji-jackson-says-criticizing-judges-is-attack-on-democracy\/1534066\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court’s Ketanji Jackson Says Criticizing Judges Is ‘Attack On Democracy’"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court’s Ketanji Jackson Says Criticizing Judges Is ‘Attack On Democracy’<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

People who criticize activist judges (who often refuse to recuse themselves amid wide-ranging conflicts of interest while ruling against Donald Trump’s agenda) are ‘attacking democracy,’ according to US Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.<\/p>\n

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson speaks in Birmingham, Ala., on Sept. 15, 2023. Butch Dill – Pool\/Getty Images<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

On May 1, Jackson – who was apparently referring to recent comments by Donald Trump, though not specifically naming him – told an audience at the\u00a0First Circuit Judicial Conference in Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, “The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity<\/strong>.”<\/p>\n

“The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law<\/strong>,” the Biden appointee continued, referring to “the elephant in the room.”<\/p>\n

As the Epoch Times<\/a><\/em> notes further, several federal judges have said the Trump administration has not complied with various court orders on federal spending, the firing of government employees, and foreign aid. The administration denies that it disobeyed the orders and has criticized judges who have halted its policy actions, in some cases calling for the judges to be impeached.<\/p>\n

Jackson\u2019s comments followed a public statement by Chief Justice John Roberts on March 18 after Trump called for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg<\/strong>, who was confirmed in 2011 after being nominated by President Barack Obama.<\/p>\n

Boasberg issued<\/a> orders forbidding the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act and then said the Trump administration disobeyed those orders. The Trump administration denies it flouted the orders and said some deportation flights had already left U.S. airspace before the initial written order was issued.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision<\/strong>,\u201d Roberts said<\/a> in a statement provided to The Epoch Times. \u201cThe normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.\u201d<\/p>\n

Later that month, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) introduced a resolution in the House to impeach Boasberg.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe cannot stand by while activist judges who incorrectly believe they have more authority than the duly-elected President of the United States, impose their own political agenda on the American people,\u201d Biggs said in a statement<\/a> on March 31.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is scheduled<\/a> on May 15 to hear oral arguments on lower court orders blocking Trump\u2019s policy of limiting birthright citizenship for certain individuals.<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s Executive Order 14160, signed on Jan. 20,\u00a0states<\/a>\u00a0that \u201cthe Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the court filings, the Department of Justice did not ask the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the executive order itself, although it acknowledged that the birthright citizenship question raises \u201cimportant constitutional questions with major ramifications for securing the border.\u201d<\/p>\n

Instead, the department made what it called a \u201cmodest\u201d request to contain the coverage of court injunctions within the parties in the lawsuits.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile the parties litigate weighty questions, the Court should \u2018restrict the scope\u2019 of multiple preliminary injunctions that \u2018purport to cover every person … in the country,\u2019 limiting those injunctions to parties actually within the courts\u2019 power,\u201d it wrote.<\/p>\n

Nationwide injunctions, also known as non-party or universal injunctions, set policy for the entire country<\/strong>. Such injunctions issued by judges have become controversial in recent years as they have become increasingly common.<\/p>\n

On April 9, the House passed<\/a> a bill on a 219\u2013213 vote in an attempt to curb the barrage of district court rulings that have blocked or delayed Trump\u2019s executive actions on multiple fronts.<\/p>\n

Wielding national injunctions in that way \u201cundermines the system of government,\u201d the bill\u2019s sponsor, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), said on the House floor on April 8.<\/p>\n

Sam Dorman contributed to this report.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span>
\nSun, 05\/04\/2025 – 20:25<\/span><\/p>\n

\u200bhttps:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/political\/supreme-courts-ketanji-jackson-says-criticizing-judges-attack-democracy<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court’s Ketanji Jackson Says Criticizing Judges Is ‘Attack On Democracy’ People who criticize activist judges (who often refuse to recuse themselves amid wide-ranging conflicts…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1534067,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1534066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1534066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1534066"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1534066\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1534067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1534066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1534066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1534066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}