{"id":1539206,"date":"2025-06-01T01:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/?p=1539206"},"modified":"2025-06-01T01:00:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T05:00:00","slug":"the-narratives-change-markets-dont","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/the-narratives-change-markets-dont\/1539206\/","title":{"rendered":"The Narratives Change; Markets Don&#8217;t&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden\">The Narratives Change; Markets Don&#8217;t&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/realinvestmentadvice.com\/resources\/blog\/the-narratives-change-markets-dont\/\"><em>Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<h2><strong>A Successful Test<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/realinvestmentadvice.com\/resources\/blog\/an-unstoppable-bull-market\/\"><strong><em>Last week,<\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0we discussed how this seems to be an\u00a0<em>\u201cunstoppable\u201d<\/em>\u00a0bull market. However, that doesn\u2019t mean markets won\u2019t pause before attempting to move higher. As we noted last week, the consolidation was expected.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cEven with Bessent\u2019s comments, that market remains overbought in the short term, and a further consolidation process is likely to occur next week. At the end of this week, we removed our short-market hedge, added to bonds, and reduced equity exposure. If the market is going to consolidate, we can allow cash to act as the primary hedge. However, if the 200-DMA is violated, the 50-DMA will become the next critical support. From a bullish perspective, the 20 and 50-DMAs are now sloping positively, which should provide rising support levels. Overall, we suspect that the market will stabilize. Of course, there are always risks to be aware of, so increased cash levels are essential now.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Most notably, this past week was the successful test of the 200-DMA. The pullback to that previous broken resistance level and subsequent bounce highly suggests that the April correction is complete and that market control returns to the Bulls. As such, there is very little resistance between current levels and all-time highs. However, as noted last week, with the markets still overbought on a momentum basis, further consolidation will be unsurprising before an advance to new highs occurs. With the MACD sell signal triggered and money flows declining, another test of the 200-DMA next week would be unsurprising.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-255-1024x753.jpg?itok=EIpLHfPY\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, the old saying \u201cApril Showers Bring May Flowers \u201d seems apropos, as the tariff-driven sell-off in April sprouted a very strong May advance. Notably, the S&amp;P 500 had its best month of May since 1990.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/Rebound-In-May.jpg?itok=HOxAFQ1q\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>However, as noted above, with the market short-term overbought and very bullish, we should expect the market to\u00a0<em>\u201cstruggle\u201d<\/em>\u00a0somewhat in June as corporate share buybacks subside and companies go into blackout before Q2 earnings season begins. Furthermore, we have often stated that earnings remain overly optimistic, which concerns markets moving forward. According to MRB Partners, the Q1 earnings season is expected to be the peak for the earnings growth cycle. Given the high correlation between forward earnings estimates and market returns, this commentary should not be readily dismissed.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-246.jpg?itok=-1MjE3kr\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>That said, investors must be most careful of\u00a0<em>\u201cmarket narratives.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 These narratives can potentially be\u00a0far more harmful than helpful to investors who get swept up in the emotions generated by headline-grabbing rationalizations. Such is the topic for this week\u2019s\u00a0<strong>#BullBearReport.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><strong>The Psychology Of The Narrative<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>How fast market narratives change to fit a particular position is always interesting. This is particularly true for podcasts and media outlets that depend on a<em>\u00a0\u201cbearish<\/em>\u201d take to sell gold or to get clicks and views. For example, I googled interest rates and here is what I got:<\/p>\n<p><em>The Treasury Market Is On The Brink Of Collapse.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em>US Economy Implodes: Bond Markets Panic<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em>Bond Vigilantes Voting Early.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em>US Risks \u201cFinancial Disaster\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>You get the idea, it\u2019s all bad. Or, at least that is the narrative right now.<\/p>\n<p><strong>So, why is the narrative so important to investors? Because we are humans.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As humans, we inherently seek structure through rules, routines, and frameworks in nearly every domain of life. This craving for predictability offers a sense of control and security. Whether dieting, learning, or investing, we often believe that following the\u00a0<em>\u201cright\u201d<\/em>\u00a0system will produce the desired result.<\/p>\n<p>Humans have an innate need to impose order on the chaos surrounding them. Nowhere is this more evident than in the stock market, where investors relentlessly seek patterns, explanations, and narratives to rationalize why markets rise and fall. It\u2019s a fascinating dance between logic and emotion, predictability and randomness.<\/p>\n<p>The stock market is a complex, ever-changing system\u00a0driven by countless factors\u2014corporate earnings, geopolitical events, interest rates, technological innovations,\u00a0<strong>and<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>most critically, mass psychology.<\/strong>\u00a0And yet, when faced with this swirling unpredictability, we instinctively reach for stories. Here is a good example.\u00a0<strong>Headlines declare that stocks are rising\u00a0<em>\u201cbecause\u201d<\/em>\u00a0of strong GDP growth. That makes sense until you see a headline that states stocks are falling \u201c<em>because\u201d<\/em>\u00a0of strong GDP growth, which might spark inflation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>They both can not be correct. However, analysts point to one data point, and we latch onto it, even though the narrative might flip tomorrow.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Why Bearish Narratives Hold More Power<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>The need for a narrative is deeply rooted in our psychology. As pattern-seeking creatures, we crave coherence and predictability. Chaos triggers anxiety. It feels dangerous, uncontrollable, and unsettling. In investing, this anxiety is magnified by the direct impact on our wealth and financial security.\u00a0<strong>We regain a semblance of control by latching onto the narrative, no matter how tenuous.\u00a0<\/strong>The narrative tells us why things are happening and what might happen next, which soothes our natural fear of uncertainty.<\/p>\n<p>When this need for control is combined with our behavioral bias of\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/realinvestmentadvice.com\/resources\/blog\/bearish-sentiment-surges-as-if-the-market-just-crashed\/\"><strong>\u201closs avoidance,\u201d<\/strong><\/a><\/em>\u00a0it is more evident why bearish narratives tend to be more popular than bullish ones. Why is\u00a0<em>\u201closs avoidance\u201d<\/em>\u00a0crucial to understand?<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201c<strong>Loss aversion is a tendency in\u00a0behavioral finance\u00a0where investors are so fearful of losses that they focus on trying to avoid a loss more so than on making gains<\/strong>. The more one experiences losses, the more likely they are to become prone to loss aversion.\u201d \u2013\u00a0Corporate Finance Institute<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/Psychological-Factors-On-Investm_0.jpg?itok=T6_fGS_x\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The reality is that humans are hardwired to prioritize\u00a0<strong>negative information<\/strong>\u00a0over optimistic information. From an evolutionary perspective, this bias was essential. Our ancestors learned to recognize threats\u00a0<em>(like predators)<\/em>\u00a0to survive.\u00a0<strong>This instinct, known as \u201c<em>negativity bias,\u201d<\/em>\u00a0influences how we process information, including financial news and market narratives.<\/strong>\u00a0Such is why\u00a0<em>\u201cbearish\u201d\u00a0<\/em>leaning podcasts and articles generate the most clicks and views.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fear Is a Stronger Motivator Than Greed<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<em>While the hope of making money drives investors, the\u00a0<strong>fear of losing money is far more powerful<\/strong>.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<strong>Bearish Narratives Seem More \u201cRational\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<em>Pessimism often feels safer and more cautious<\/em>.<em>\u00a0During volatile markets, a bearish forecast can sound more analytical and responsible.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<strong>Media Amplifies Negative Headlines<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<em>News outlets know that fear sells. Sensational headlines like \u201cMARKETS IN TURMOIL\u201d or \u201cCRASH COMING?\u201d generate clicks and engagement.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<strong>Herd Behavior and Echo Chambers<\/strong>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<em>When markets are shaky, investors flock to bearish opinions for validation. If others are cautious or fearful, it reinforces the idea that a downturn is imminent, even if underlying fundamentals remain sound. Social media and financial news create echo chambers that amplify these fears.<\/em><\/p>\n<h3><strong>The Bond Auction Example<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Here is a good example of narrative driving markets.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, interest rates ticked up after headlines rang out that the 20-year bond auction was horrific, signaling that the U.S. debt market is on the verge of collapse. As\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/realinvestmentadvice.com\/resources\/blog\/narratives-vs-fundamentals-battle-in-the-bond-market\/\"><strong><em>Michael Lebowitz noted<\/em><\/strong><\/a>\u00a0this past week:<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>The bearish narratives were in overdrive after the Moody\u2019s credit downgrade and the larger-than-expected \u201cBig Beautiful\u201d government spending bill. But narratives always need to be fed. The bearish bond narrative ate on May 21, 2025, with a Treasury 20-year auction deemed \u201cterrible\u201d and \u201chorrible\u201d by some pundits. Some interpreted the auction as an obvious sign that the Treasury was struggling to fund itself.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Some fear-mongers pointed out the \u201clarge\u201d auction tail. The tail is the difference between the auction yield and the yield before the auction. A large tail can mean insufficient demand for the auctioned bonds. As the graph below shows, the recent red tail is not that abnormal. Moreover, the size of the tail is volatile in both directions. This is partly because the 20-year bond is not as widely regarded as a market benchmark as other maturities.<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-224%20%281%29.jpg?itok=AQg1lEO-\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The headlines were rampant that this\u00a0<em>\u201cterrible, horrific\u00a0auction\u201d\u00a0<\/em>resulted from no one wanting to own U.S. Treasuries. However, that wasn\u2019t true, as\u00a0<strong><em>\u201cindirect buyers\u201d\u00a0<\/em>were allotted 82% of the auction\u00a0<\/strong>bonds.\u00a0<em><strong>These are primarily foreign central banks. So, foreign demand was strong despite the anti-dollar narrative claiming that central banks are selling US Treasuries in size.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>However, as Mike notes, just a week earlier, the 10-year auction, which was three times larger than the 20-year auction, was stellar.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cPrimary dealers (direct bidders), the backstop for Treasury auctions, account for the third-lowest allotment since at least 2008 at 8.9%. This signifies that demand from other sources was robust. Second, there were bids for 2.6x as many bonds as were being auctioned. The average of the last six auctions was 2.4x. Furthermore, the ratio was at the high end of the range of the last ten-plus years.<\/em>\u201c<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-225%20%281%29.jpg?itok=gOpCePwa\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>However, the<em>\u00a0\u201cbearish media\u201d\u00a0<\/em>overlooked the vastly more significant 10-year auction to focus on the 20-year auction, which fits thei<em>r\u00a0\u201cnarrative.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>So, is the narrative that the<em>\u00a0\u201cdeficit\u201d<\/em>\u00a0will cause a debt collapse accurate? Or, is that just the latest\u00a0<em>\u201crationalization\u201d<\/em>\u00a0to feed our\u00a0<em>\u201cnegativity bias?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<h2><strong>The History Of Rates And Deficits<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Yesterday,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/realinvestmentadvice.com\/resources\/blog\/ray-dalio-is-predicting-a-financial-crisis-again\/\"><strong><em>I published an in-depth article<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/a>about Ray Dalio claiming the\u00a0<em>\u201cdeficit has become critical.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u201d\u00a0\u201cIt\u2019s like \u2026 I\u2019m a doctor, and I\u2019m looking at the patient, and I\u2019ve said, you\u2019re having this accumulation, and I can tell you that this is very, very serious, and I can\u2019t tell you the exact time.\u00a0<\/em><strong><em>I would say that if we\u2019re really looking over the next three years, to give or take a year or two, that we\u2019re in that type of a critical, critical situation<\/em>.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Of course, the narrative would not be complete without a terrifying chart to back it up, like this from Deutsche Bank:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cHere we remind readers, that the Big, Beautiful Bill currently in Congress has been scored to\u00a0add about $5 trillion to the debt,\u00a0<strong>resulting in what we said would be\u00a0\u201cDebt Doomsday\u201d\u00a0for the US;<\/strong>\u00a0this is simply a trade-off of short-term prosperity (a few extra trillion in the next 4 years) for long-term economic collapse (that 220% in long term debt.GDP).\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-3%20%281%29_1.jpg?itok=yBslFq-f\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>That is indeed scary. But as detailed in that article, he has been predicting this same crisis for more than a decade. For investors who listened to Dalio\u2019s predictions of a coming\u00a0<em>\u201cdepression<\/em>\u201d a decade ago, they missed participating in one of the most significant bull markets in U.S. history.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-4%20%281%29_1.jpg?itok=BvlnqP7p\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>However, the facts show us that\u00a0<strong>rising debts and deficits lead to lower interest rates, not higher.<\/strong>\u00a0The reason is that debt diverts capital from productive uses into debt service. As such, economic growth slows. We can see this visually by comparing the Federal debt as a percentage of GDP to potential economic growth.\u00a0<strong>Since government spending is primarily non-productive, it should be unsurprising that increases in debt do not foster more vigorous economic activity.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/Debt-to-GDP-vs-Potential-Economi_0.jpg?itok=rIE8Hsem\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Where Dalio and other media bears are incorrect in their view is that the recent surge in inflation, and ultimately interest rates, was not a function of organic economic growth. I<strong>t was a stimulus-driven surge in the supply\/demand equation following the pandemic-driven shutdown.<\/strong>\u00a0As those monetary and fiscal inflows reverse, that support is fading. In the future, we must understand the factors that drive rates over time: economic growth, wages, and inflation. Visually, we can create a composite index of GDP and inflation versus interest rates.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-242-1024x707.jpg?itok=wnT0WPNR\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Given that interest rates\u00a0<em>(return on loaned capital)<\/em>\u00a0are derived from both economic activity\u00a0<em>(demand for credit)<\/em>\u00a0and inflation\u00a0<em>(future cost)<\/em>, the high correlation should be unsurprising.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-243-1024x706.jpg?itok=G_WPt3eL\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Contrary to the recent barrage of bearish narratives, slowing economic growth lowers inflation\u00a0<em>(a function of supply and demand)<\/em>\u00a0and reduces rates.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Markets Don\u2019t Change<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>What is most important to investors is that the market absorbs all negative media narratives over the long term.\u00a0<strong>The recent barrage of negative narratives surrounding debts, deficits, tariffs, inflation, wars, Trump, etc., is all just there to feed your negative bias<\/strong>. However, zooming out, investors who have stayed away from investing in the financial markets to \u201c<em>avoid the loss\u201d<\/em>\u00a0of potential adverse outcomes have paid a dear price in reduced financial wealth.<\/p>\n<p>In other words,\u00a0<strong>there is always a \u201c<em>reason\u201d\u00a0<\/em>not to invest.<\/strong>\u00a0However, the current narrative will change, but the market won\u2019t. Here is a good example of how narratives change. Since 2007, interest rates have gyrated up and down. Currently, rates are still lower than in 2008, but have risen. What is essential is that each time rates went up, the \u201c<em>narrative\u201d<\/em>\u00a0was always different. Yet, the US has been running ever-increasing deficits since 2008, but that was never the narrative\u2026until now.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-248.jpg?itok=aojF550k\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>However, when it comes to investing, there have been periods of deep market declines. But those events didn\u2019t occur overnight. There were always plenty of warning signs to help investors reduce risk and navigate those periods. However, even those who stayed invested fared far better than those who stayed out of the bull market advances in fear of the subsequent decline.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/s3\/files\/inline-images\/image-244.jpg?itok=8cYZXfuR\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>I am NOT saying you should passively stand there<\/strong>\u00a0and let an eventual recessionary bear market or financial event wash over you. Investors can, and should, manage portfolio risk and navigate markets during uncertain times.\u00a0<strong>However, most bearish narratives are like background noise in the investing world.\u00a0<\/strong>There will always be a headline or analyst warning you to step aside. Sure, some of those concerns are valid. But reacting emotionally, selling everything, and going to cash often leads to missed opportunities.<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Tips For Navigating The Narrative<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Here are a few strategies I recommend to help investors\u00a0<strong>navigate the constant drumbeat of pessimism<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\udd0e\u00a0<strong>1. Separate Signal from Noise<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bearish narratives are often based on isolated data points taken out of context. Look at the bigger picture:<\/p>\n<p><em>Instead of panicking over an inverted yield curve, examine credit conditions, corporate earnings, and consumer confidence.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em>If markets correct, assess whether the underlying fundamentals of your investments have truly deteriorated or if it\u2019s short-term volatility.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\udcca\u00a0<strong>2. Use a Disciplined Risk Management Framework<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>At RIA, we don\u2019t ignore market risks\u2014we manage them. That means:<\/p>\n<p><em>Rebalancing portfolios proactively. If markets have run hot, we trim positions back to targets. If we see opportunity amid panic, we increase exposure.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em>Setting clear stop-loss levels. This protects gains and limits downside risk without making emotional decisions.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em>Diversifying across asset classes to smooth returns during volatility.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\udca1\u00a0<strong>3. Lean into Value, Quality, and Dividends<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When bearish narratives dominate, investors often abandon sound fundamentals. That\u2019s when we lean into:<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Value-oriented stocks<\/strong>\u00a0with strong balance sheets and consistent cash flows.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em><strong>Dividend payers<\/strong>\u00a0that provide income during market turbulence.<\/em><br \/>\n\t<em><strong>Quality companies<\/strong>\u00a0that can weather economic downturns better than speculative plays.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\udd70\ufe0f\u00a0<strong>4. Remember the Long Game<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bearish narratives may feel urgent, but markets are forward-looking. A well-structured, long-term portfolio can withstand temporary declines. Historically, those who stayed the course during volatility were better positioned for the eventual recovery.<\/p>\n<p>Successful investing is not about beating some arbitrary\u00a0<em>\u201cindex.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0It is about managing risk, preserving capital, and steadily compounding returns toward your goals. Ignore the noise, stay disciplined, and remember: no one hands out prizes for reckless investing\u2014only consequences.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>      <span class=\"field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden\"><a title=\"View user profile.\" href=\"https:\/\/cms.zerohedge.com\/users\/tyler-durden\" class=\"username\">Tyler Durden<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden\">Sat, 05\/31\/2025 &#8211; 21:00<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u200b<a href=\"https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/markets\/narratives-change-markets-dont\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"\">https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/markets\/narratives-change-markets-dont<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Narratives Change; Markets Don&#8217;t&#8230; Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com, A Successful Test Last week,\u00a0we discussed how this seems to be an\u00a0\u201cunstoppable\u201d\u00a0bull market. However,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":1539207,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1539206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","wpcat-1-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1539206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1539206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1539206\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1539207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1539206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1539206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bugaluu.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1539206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}